MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 3507275MC |
Device Problems
Material Rupture (1546); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problem
Capsular Contracture (1761)
|
Event Date 11/03/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: capsular contracture grade iv.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a female patient who underwent a breast augmentation primary with a mentor memorygel, 275cc silicone breast implant experienced left-sided capsular contracture grade iv postoperative.As a result, patient underwent bilateral removal on (b)(6) 2024.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information received on april 07, 2024 indicated that the patient also experienced symptomatic rupture.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Suspect device received on march 21, 2024.Device evaluation completed on march 24, 2024.The product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the sm mod classic gel, 275cc breast implant was found to have a tear on the posterior view, measuring approximately 0.1 cm.In addition, shell abrasion was noted on the edges of the rupture.The evaluation determined that the possible cause of the rupture was consistent with normal wear.Shell abrasion suggests in-vivo folding or creasing of the device.This may be the result of the following factors: continuous and sustained stresses to the device such as too small breast pocket and folding or wrinkling of the shell in the breast pocket.In some cases, the breast implants may also wear out over time.Mentor concluded that the capsular contracture in the patient´s breast was the result of the body´s individual physiological response to the implantation of a foreign object in soft tissue.Capsular contracture is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our current product insert data sheet.The american society of plastic surgeons recommends and encourages member surgeons to always submit breast implants, capsule, and effusion to pathology for examination.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.No corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated device evaluation completed on april 17, 2024.The product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection and leak testing of the returned device.During visual evaluation, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the sm mod classic gel, 275cc returned device.Leak testing was performed, in accordance with mentor procedures, and no leak sites or gel exposures were detected during the analysis.Although no conclusion could be reach on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use contain the following caution: rupture status identified by mri evaluation includes both suspected ruptures, which are those ruptures identified by mri but not confirmed by explantation and examination of the device, and confirmed ruptures, which are those ruptures that are confirmed by evaluation of the explanted devices.The event described could not be confirmed as the breast implant was returned without detectable gel exposure.Although no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the laboratory analysis.Mentor concluded that the capsular contracture in the patient´s breast was the result of the body´s individual physiological response to the implantation of a foreign object in soft tissue.Capsular contracture is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our current product insert data sheet.The american society of plastic surgeons recommends and encourages member surgeons to always submit breast implants, capsule, and effusion to pathology for examination.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|