• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX AFX; VELA SUPRARENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX AFX; VELA SUPRARENAL Back to Search Results
Model Number A34-34/C100-O20 V
Device Problems Off-Label Use (1494); Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Aneurysm (1708); Ruptured Aneurysm (4436)
Event Date 02/24/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The patient was initially implanted with an afx2 bifurcated stent graft an afx vela suprarenal aortic extension and an ovation ix extender to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).This initial procedure is outside the indications of use (off-label) due to the use of adjunctive devices not compatible with afx system per the ifu.Approximately seven (7) years post initial procedure, it was reported that the patient did not come back for follow up computed tomography (ct) scans.The afx aortic extension was found to have slipped over that time resulting in a type 1a endoleak and the aneurysm had grown to 12cm.The physician elected to re-line the original implanted devices with a medtronic (non-endologix) graft to resolve this event.The final patient status was reported as stable post secondary procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device involved in this event will not be returned for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.Patient medical records and imaging studies will be requested for further evaluation by the clinical specialist.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device iteration is afx with duraply h3 other text : device remains implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported adverse event/incident was investigated in alignment with endologix operating procedures and work instructions.Where possible, it is endologix practice to make at least three good faith efforts to retrieve a reported adverse event/incident related device as well as medical records and medical imaging.An evaluation of the manufacturing record was completed.A review of the part number/lot number combination needed for device identification shows the device to have been properly manufactured and released in accordance with the device master record.The review confirms there were no manufacturing or processing non-conformities identified that would contribute to the reported adverse event/incident.An evaluation of the device could not be completed.The device was not returned to endologix for evaluation because it remains implanted.A clinical evaluation of the adverse event/incident was completed.An examination of medical records and/or medical imaging received by endologix shows that the 2.8mm movement of the aortic cuff, type 1a endoleak, type 1b endoleak of the left common iliac artery and aneurysm enlargement of 76.1mm are confirmed.The additional endovascular procedure (non-endologix) graft is unconfirmed.This is moderately consistent with the reported adverse event/incident.The clinical assessment also shows reasonable evidence to suggest a type 3b endoleak of the distal main body and an aortic rupture occurred that was not in the event as reported.The type 3b endoleak and aortic rupture were discovered during a review of the computed tomography (ct) scan dated (b)(6) 2024.Device, use, procedure or anatomy relatedness of the complaint could not be determined.Procedure related harms for this complaint could not be identified.The initial procedure was off label due to concomitant product use (ovation right limb).It is unlikely this contributed to the reported event.The proximal extension was sub-optimally placed at the index procedure (11mm from base of the left renal artery).It is unclear if this contributed to the reported event.The superior stent margin of the proximal extension moved only 2.8mm from 2017 to 2024.The final patient status was reported as stable.No additional investigation of this reported adverse event/incident is planned.However, should additional information relevant to the investigation outcome become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this and similar adverse events/incidents.Device iteration is afx with duraply.Corrections: g3: awareness date has been updated.H6: investigation finding codes: remove code 3233.H6: investigation conclusion codes: remove code 11.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX
Type of Device
VELA SUPRARENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENDOLOGIX
2 musick
,
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
gary kirchgater
2 musick
,
irvine, CA 92618
8009832284
MDR Report Key18953766
MDR Text Key338306729
Report Number3011063223-2024-00038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
UDI-Device Identifier00818009013651
UDI-Public(01)00818009013651(17)191115
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/15/2019
Device Model NumberA34-34/C100-O20 V
Device Lot Number1615440034
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/26/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/21/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/08/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/10/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/05/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
AFX2 BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT, LOT# 1598500013; OVATION IX EXTENDER, LOT# FS121516-23
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-