• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Failure to Interrogate (1332); Battery Problem (2885); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Incontinence (1928); Ambulation Difficulties (2544)
Event Date 10/30/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The reason for call was patient reported they have not been using their device for over a year.Patient stated they stopped using their device in the first week of november or the last week in october of last year, or more than that because they felt like the device was not working.Patient stated that they went to have their stimulator adjusted in the past by a rep and the next day that they woke up, they tried to get up and walk and were unable to.Patient noted that they were in a nursing home and had to wear diapers for over a year; patient followed up saying that they lost a year of their life.Patient mentioned that they do not want to use the device again after that situation.Patient stated that they have an mri of their left hip tomorrow and that they need to have their stimulator turned on and charged.Patient stated that they turned the controller on and they got a screen that had them choose a language and them they were confused on what to select next so they called patient services; agent understood this to be the setup process.Agent walked the patient thr ough finishing setting up the controller; patient was about to pair the controller and implant when they got battery empty charge controller message.Agent reviewed that the patient is going to have to charge their controller and then finish up the pairing process, then they can charge their implant and enter mri mode.Patient asked about charge duration and agent reviewed general use of the equipment with the patient.Patient noted that they do not remember how to use the equipment.Agent advised the patient to charge their controller up and then finish the pairing process; agent mentioned that the patient should call back with any questions or issues with starting a charge session.On (b)(6) 2024 pt called back in and reported their was a software problem that appeared after charging the controller.Agent walked pt through resetting the controller.Pt then needed to set up for implant again.They could not find the device.Agent walked pt through passive recharge mode.Pt was able to exit passive recharge mode and begin charging normally.Agent will call pt back to walk to through entering mri mode. agent called back and pt was able to successfully enter mri mode.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id 97745nt.Serial# (b)(6).Review of this mdr and/or additional information received shows that there is no information to reasonably suggest that the device in this report may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or that the device in this report has malfunctioned.Therefore, this event does not meet the reporting requirements stipulated in 21 cfr 803.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) reporting that one of their healthcare provider (hcp) accounts got a reference letter and was confused about the follow-up steps.The rep did not currently have the letter in their pos session.The rep said they spoke with the hcp and said the letter was something about how the patient was reprogrammed and it was noted that the hcp or rep had not seen the patient for several months.The patient mentioned difficulties walking, but the rep said the hcp had confirmed disc herniation and the rep speculated that the disc herniation caused the patient¿s symptoms not the reprogramming of the scs device.The rep said pathological changes led to the patient not being able to walk for months.Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) reporting that the manufacturer representative (rep)¿s knowledge the device was not causal or contributory to the patient¿s symptoms of not being able to get up and walk, being in a nursing home, incontinence, and disc herniation.The cause of these symptoms was not determined to their knowledge.The rep indicated that they were not the rep that made the adjustments for them so they didn¿t know what parameters were changed.The rep was no longer full time with the company.To the rep¿s knowledge the patient did not contact the rep to meet for another reprogramming and did not follow-up with their provider¿s office either.The rep wasn¿t provided information regarding the outcome of the event.It was indicated that the provided information had been confirmed with the physician.No further complications were reported/anticipated.***mdr decision corrected to not reportable.***.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key18955522
MDR Text Key338305151
Report Number3004209178-2024-07571
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00763000315467
UDI-Public00763000315467
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/14/2023
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received03/21/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/22/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/03/2024
Date Device Manufactured08/25/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H11...."
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age57 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-