• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Failure to Interrogate (1332); Malposition of Device (2616); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/29/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id: 97715, serial#: (b)(6), implanted: (b)(6) 2023, product type: implantable neurostimulator.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
2024-jan-11: information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for spinal pain indications.Caller states pt has two ins's--one for c-spine and one for t-spine.Caller notes they are both located in the flank and per their guess are approx.5 inches apart.The caller notes the ins's are far enough apart where the rtm's do not overlap when pt attempts to charge both ins's simultaneously.The caller states the pt has no issues when using their controllers to connect to the ins's simultaneously; however, when the pt attempts to charge the ins's at the same time they are unable to do so and can only charge one ins at a time.The caller notes that the pt's ins's in this instance were 50% and 60% charged when attempting to charge both.The caller states that for some brief period of time, when each controller screen shows the message to place the recharger telemetry module (rtm) over the ins and press 'continue' to charge they can charge both but thi s charging does not last for both.The caller notes that the pt will have one ins charging and the other controller for the other ins will show 'no device found'--the caller indicated that the pt has been trying to press 'retry' so agent noted thept should be pressing 'recharge' instead.Agent noted that the caller can try to flip-flop between which is charging and which is showing 'no device found' so they can attempt to get both charging and also consider placing a barrier between the two while charging to see if that helps resolve.The caller will continue to work with pt and agent to pursue potential additional guidance from the team.Agent reviewed ifp regarding 'neurostimulator location' and based on the ifp the systems would appear to be far enough apart, agent did reference legacy labeling where the recommendation is 8 inches.2024-feb-22: additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep).The rep reported that the ins's are too close together.Unable to charge.Right ins moved more lateral.Patient was doing well.Later, rep called in with patient to discuss recharging issues pt has been having since having the right ins moved to a different location.Per rep ever since then pt claims to have not been able to charge the ins since then and that ins has been off since surgery.Rep states they are right over battery, sees poor recharge quality and then it freezes.For the past 20 mins been seeing same thing, finally got to the passive recharge screen where she can see the antenna numbers and it bounces around from 26-48.Reviewed ins may be depleted and need to complete this passive recharge sessions for 10 min up to 3 x.It was noted that they are able to see that battery is in the red.Reviewed importance of recharger telemetry module (rtm) placement, effects of swelling in the pocket area and effect in recharging.Reviewed to consider disable/enable the device, try pt's other rtm to see if same thing happens.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Rep reported that ipg moved on (b(6) 2022.The issue has resolved.Patient can now charge both simultaneously.Patient's weight was unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key18961031
MDR Text Key338379651
Report Number3004209178-2024-07665
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00763000315467
UDI-Public00763000315467
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/10/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/22/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/22/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/22/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/10/2024
Date Device Manufactured07/05/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H11...."
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age42 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-