Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Based on complaint information, the device was not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (96375250) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As part of the acclarent quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Based on the very limited information contained in the complaint, since this adverse event requires medical or surgical intervention to preclude permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure, it is considered serious and reportable.Since there were reported malfunctions with acclarent navigation balloon dilation system and its component parts but the information was reported with little to no information on what the failure was (defective/faulty device, etc.), the file is coded as unknown failure.If the devices are returned they will be analyzed and tested, which may allow for the determination of a root cause for the failure/s.With the information available and without the complaint product available to be returned for analysis, the reported product issue documented in the complaint cannot be confirmed through functional evaluation and analysis.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is one of 6 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3005172759-2024-00016, 3005172759-2024-00017, 3005172759-2024-00018, 3005172759-2024-00020, and 3005172759-2024-00021.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by acclarent, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, acclarent, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2022, during a balloon sinuplasty (bsp) procedure, the patient sustained an injury to her carotid artery that resulted in her suffering a catastrophic stroke.The reported devices used during the procedure were: a relieve tract balloon (rt1640a / 211202a-pc), two 6mm x 16mm relieva spinplus navigation balloon sinuplasty system (rsp0616mfsn), one from lot 220419a-pc and one from lot 220504a-pc, a disposable trudi probe 0-degree, 5in (tdp0005 / 210201b-pc), an acclarent balloon inflation device (bid30 / 96375250), and a trudi nav cable (tdnc001 / 211206c-pc) and the trudi navigation system.It is reported that the patient believed that the acclarent navigation balloon dilation system and its component parts, including any ai (artificial intelligence software) may have malfunctioned and failed to perform as intended during the procedure, and that as a result, the patient¿s carotid artery was injured.
|