C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 M.R.I. LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, HICKMAN SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 0603880 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Difficult to Insert (1316); Dull, Blunt (2407); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/24/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, when tried to dilate the vein, the internal dilator was allegedly noted with blunt tip.It was further reported that when tried to dilate, the internal dilator allegedly broke its tip.Furthermore, the device was removed.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2026).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, when tried to dilate the vein, the internal dilator was allegedly noted with blunt tip.It was further reported that when tried to dilate, the internal dilator allegedly broke its tip.Furthermore, the passage was not possible and the attempt to pass the catheter caused more bleeding than expected.Reportedly, the procedure was suspended and the device was removed.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation.Three electronic photos were provided for review.The photo shows one the clinician showing the dilator.The distal tip of the dilator was noted to be blunt and deformed.Therefore the investigation is confirmed for the reported blunt and identified deformation issues.However the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported fracture issue as the reported event cannot be confirmed from the provided photos.Also the investigation is inconclusive for the reported difficulty in inserting issues as no sample was received to perform the functional tests.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: b5, d4 (expiration date: 07/2026), g3, h6 (device, method) h11: e1, h6 (result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|