It was reported that a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4, restricted posterior leaflet, and bi-leaflet tethering.A mitraclip xtw was implanted without issues.A mitraclip xt was then inserted and placed on the mitral valve, lateral to the xtw.While attempting to deploy the clip, difficulties unwinding the lock line (ll) occurred.The lock cap was removed, the rubber o ring came off, and an attempt to unwind the lock line was made.However, the lock line was tightly wrapped around the lock mechanism.A lot of time was spent to slowly untie the lock line, and kelly forceps was used to hold the line away.After about 5-10 minutes, a knot was observed in the lock line.To deploy the clip, the ll had to be cut, and the ll was able to be deployed.The procedure was completed with two clips implanted, reducing the mr to a grade of 1.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported difficult or delayed activation due to inability to unwrap the lock line.The reported knot on the lock line appears to occur during maneuvers to unwrap of the line.The reported unexpected medical intervention was a result of case specific circumstance as forceps was used to hold the line and the line was cut to deploy the clip.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|