Catalog Number CDS0702-XTW |
Device Problems
Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/05/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient presented with grade 4 degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr), anterior mitral leaflet (aml) flail, a lot of chordae tendinea and not a lot of space within the left ventricle to the papillary muscle head for a mitraclip procedure.During the procedure, first mitraclip xtw was prepped and inserted as per ifu.During system prep the device functioned as intended.During the first grasp attempt the anterior gripper actuation was not visualized.The gripper did not lower.Troubleshooting was performed and the clip was reopened to reconfirm if the gripper would lower.The gripper did not lower.Troubleshooting as per ifu was performed by locking the clip and unlocking again, and actuating the gripper simultaneous and independent.To be on the safe side we therefore the grasp was released to remove the clip.While trying to get free from the aml the clip was caught by the aml or in chordae tendinae.Physician managed to get the clip free, and removed the inverted clip to the left atrium.After that maneuver no additional defect of the mitral valve or leaflets was noted.With the clip in the left atrium we noted that we could see the anterior gripper lowered while the gripper lever was retracted.By actuating the gripper lever, the anterior gripper did not move up or down any longer.The clip was removed from the patient as per ifu without any complications.And a new mitraclip was prepped and used as per ifu.This new clip was positioned successfully in a2/p2 medial position, and another clip was positioned in a2/p2 central position to improve mi from pre grade 4 to post grade 1.Patient was hemodynamically stable the whole time the replacement clips were successfully implanted, no adverse patient effects or clinically significant delay.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
All available information was investigated and the reported difficult or delayed positioning associate with clip caught on anatomy could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was related to patient anatomy or procedural circumstances.The reported gripper actuation issue was confirmed via returned device analysis and observed the tactile gripper line had separated from the clip (material separation) and was outside the l-lock shaft hole with the gripper line trumpet intact.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.Based on available information, the reported gripper actuation issue appears to be related to the observed gripper line separation.The investigation determined the observed gripper line separation to be related to a potential product issue.This complaint is within the scope of exception (action) 135842 as the complaint description and device code match the specific issue described in the exception.Therefore, exception (issue) 130421 and exception (action) 135842 are referenced.The exception investigation evaluated the reported issue, and the engineering group determined the root cause appears to be related to manufacturing variability within specifications leading to tolerance stack up between the gripper lines, coupler, and l-lock components.The issue is being addressed per internal operating procedures.Abbott will continue to trend the performance of these devices.A cause for the reported difficult or delayed positioning associate with clip caught on anatomy cannot be determined.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|