Model Number 20000ISM |
Device Problem
Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problem
Cusp Tear (2656)
|
Event Date 03/06/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The event is captured by edwards lifesciences under complaint #: (b)(4).B2: other serious- even though there was no reintervention, there is a potential for reintervention in this case.The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete.It should be noted, the device was implanted in the tricuspid position.At this time, the pascal precision transcatheter valve repair system is only indicated for the native mitral valve in the us, addressing degenerative mitral regurgitation.But, it is approved for both tricuspid and mitral spaces in the region where the procedure was performed.Therefore, deployment in the tricuspid position will not be considered off-label in this case.H3 other text : device remains implanted.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received notification of a pascal precision ace procedure in tricuspid position where during the procedure, a leaflet tear occurred, and the procedure was aborted.Patient had tricuspid regurgitation (tr) grade 4, ef 52% with a gap of 6-7mm, main jet a-s and second jet p-s.Valve had mixed morphology fmr and a ruptured cord.The strategy was to place the device a-s relatively central.Device was inserted, but different positions and orientations were tried and there was no significant tr reduction achieved or there was splitting of the jet/created an eccentric jet.This was aggravated by a retracted septal leaflet and there was no chance to grasp both leaflets at the same time.Independent grasping was attempted which started with the lateral one and grasped the septal afterwards.Tension was visible in fluoro and echo on the system during the maneuver.Minimum 5-6 positions were tried with no significant tr reduction.During the last maneuver the lateral leaflet was captured, and it was tried to grasp the septal second.Tension was built up in the system by swinging to septal and then the catheter jumped.The tension was released from the system and the lateral leaflet detached.Ti appeared a little worse in the echo and a slight tear was visible on the posterior leaflet in the echo.At this point, the team decided to retrieve the system to avoid further manipulation.Retrieval of the system was done without complications.Patient was noted as to be in stable condition.Patient was going to be screened for evoque.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following sections were updated/corrected/added: b4, b5, g3, g6, h2, h6 and h11.The complaint for leaflet damaged while capturing was confirmed with empirical evidence based on the accounts by the edwards clinical specialist present during the procedure.Available information suggests patient anatomy and procedural complications likely contributed to the event due to these operational context factors potentially resulted in the event.Based on extensive complaint investigations, these events are most likely due to patient factors, procedural factors, imaging factors, or a combination of these factors and are not attributed to device malfunctions or manufacturing nonconformances.The pascal/precision ifu and training materials provide adequate instructions on device usage and optimization prior to release.These events will continue to be monitored and complaints trending, and control limits are managed and assessed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received stated that the evoque procedure is planned on the (b)(6) 2024, to treat the patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|