As reported by the field clinical specialist (fcs), during a transfemoral tavr procedure with a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve, there was resistance during insertion of the 26mm commander delivery system and valve into the 14 fr esheath+, and it was noted that the appearance of a strut extending from the valve during valve alignment.After discussion of options, the team opted to deploy the valve.Successful deployment was achieved with a 90/10 (aortic/ventricular) placement and a mean gradient via echo of 6 mm hg.There was no injury to the patient.The patient was sent to recovery in stable condition.
|
Correction to h6 based on additional information.The event reported is anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.The device was not returned for evaluation.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.The ifu, current risk mitigations include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Imagery was provided by the site, and the following was observed: one bent strut was bent outward, greater than 90 degrees at the inflow side.The strut remained bent post-deployment.The patient's left access vessel had presence of tortuosity and calcification.The reported event for frame damage was confirmed based on provided imagery.A review of the device history record and lot history were done, and did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance contributed to the complaint event.As such, available information suggests that procedural factors (incomplete loader advancement, excessive manipulation/high push force) and/or patient factors (calcification/ tortuosity) may have contributed to the reported event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
|