Model Number 7841 |
Device Problems
Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Failure to Capture (1081); Low impedance (2285); Device Sensing Problem (2917)
|
Patient Problems
Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Syncope/Fainting (4411); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/16/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with the pacemaker device exhibited noisy signals and loss of capture (loc) on this right ventricular (rv) channel.The rv impedances went half from what the measurements were during implant.This rv lead currently remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report contains correction in entire section e initial reporter and section g2 report source.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with the pacemaker device exhibited noisy signals and loss of capture (loc) on this right ventricular (rv) channel.The rv impedances went half from what the measurements were during implant.This rv lead currently remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with the pacemaker device exhibited noisy signals and loss of capture (loc) on this right ventricular (rv) channel.The rv impedances went half from what the measurements were during implant.This rv lead currently remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information received indicated that this rv lead was repositioned.The patient was brought into emergency room (er) the night before the reposition procedure and this patient was said to have had a syncopal event and was hypotensive.Troubleshooting was performed and x-ray imagining was reviewed.After device interrogation the following was noted, loss of ventricular capture at max output, noticeable decrease in rv lead impedance from implant and variable decreased sensing.Subsequently this rv lead was repositioned and confirmed to be electronically stable.Prior to patient leaving the lab an echocardiogram was performed to assess pericardial effusion.The physician noted that the patient's pericardial effusion had improved significantly.A post operative check was performed the next morning and patient stated to have felt much better.No additional patient adverse effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report contains additional information in section b5 describe event or problem, section h1 type of reportable event, section h6 patient codes and impact codes.This report contains correction in entire section e initial reporter and section g2 report source.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|