MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 3505700BC |
Device Problems
Material Rupture (1546); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problem
Capsular Contracture (1761)
|
Event Date 02/21/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Upon visual evaluation of the image provided in the complaint, the implant was observed ruptured.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: rupture/capsular contracture.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient who underwent breast augmentation revision with 700cc mentor memorygel breast implants experienced bilateral capsular contracture and bilateral rupture post procedure.The left sided capsular contracture was baker grade iii.The right sided capsular contracture was baker grade ii.As a result, unilateral left sided replacement was performed on (b)(6) 2024.No surgery was performed on the right side.See 1645337-2024-03800 for contralateral prosthesis report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The impacted product was received by the failure analysis lab on april 3, 2024.The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on april 9, 2024.Device evaluation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection, microscopic examination, and thickness measurement of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the breast implant was found to be ruptured and received in two parts.A microscopic examination was performed, and the cause of the tear could not be identified.Therefore, a thickness measurement was conducted on the shell at the tear, and the thickness was within manufacturing specifications.Although no conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use contain the following caution: rupture can occur at any time after implantation, but it is more likely to occur the longer the implant is implanted.The following things may cause the implant to rupture: damage by surgical instruments; stressing the implant during implantation and weakening it; folding or wrinkling of the implant shell; excessive force to the chest (e.G.During closed capsulotomy); trauma; compression during mammographic imaging; and severe capsular contracture.Breast implants may also simply wear out over time.The american society of plastic surgeons recommends and encourages member surgeons to always submit breast implants, capsules, and effusion to pathology for examination.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|