• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Failure to Interrogate (1332); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Unstable (1667); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/23/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Information was received from multiple sources (manufacturer representative, healthcare provider) regarding a patient who was implan ted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that the nurse contacted the manufacturer representative (rep) because one of their patients, who has had an intellis neurostimulator (97715) for 3 years, is experiencing connection problems between her remote control (97745) and her stimulator. when the patient activated her remote control to change program intensity, she was syst ematically blocked on screen 16: "no device found", which meant she had to connect her antenna (97755) to communicate with the stimulator.According to the center, the remote control and the antenna have already been changed, the pairing between the remote control and the stimulator has also been redone without success, and an x-ray was carried out and did not show a flipped ins.No symptoms were reported.Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep).Regarding the cause of the no device found screen and communication issues, it was reported that the situation is not clear because the event was reported by the patient without the possibility to verify it.The patient will be seen again in consultation on october 25 in order to clarify the situation which seems to be resolved according to the information provided by the center by phone.So far as the rep knows, the decoupling and coupling the ins via the technician mode from the suggestion of technical services resolved the issue.Further actions to resolve the issue are that they will have a consultation on october 25th to investigate it.The provided information has been confirmed with the physician/account.Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) reporting that the ¿no device found¿ screen cause remained undetermined; it also happened while the ins was charged.Further actions taken was the nurse tried to resolve by re-pairing the ins with the patient controller but did not work.The issue did resolve by pairing the ins with a different patient controller.Additional information was received.It was reported that corrective maintenance and repair was needed.The customer communicated written or oral dissatisfaction with the product; defective.[reverse issue (20240103047)] additional information was received.It was reported that the patient describes that their controller does not detect their implanted neurostimulator (ins) even though it is fully charged.They explain that they must use their recharger to find the connection.This would have started a few weeks after implantation of the ins.The controller and recharger were replaced in october and seemed to have resolved the problem.The patient explained that this problem has returned since these replacements.The fault was not noticed by the follow-up nurse, and we were not able to reproduce it when they came.The interrogation does not allow us to find any environmental elements that could induce interference.Interrogating the ins with the physician tablet shows no alert but little use of the ins by the patient.It was proposed to let the patient write down the time/date of the events.When the patient comes back to the hospital it is advised to send us the session report, manufacturer report and diary of the patient.This way we can try to compare all the information.The current ins is therefore located a few centimeters lower on the abdominal area than the first one was.And this ins seems less parallel to the skin.Resolution of the issue is unknown, no patient harm reported.Additional information was received.The rep stated that they were only informed of this problem last october, but the patient declared that the problem occurred a few weeks/months after implantation, without giving a precise date.It was confirmed that the recharger had already been returned.It was confirmed that the ins was not depleted at the time the rep meet with the patient, but per the patient, the device shows little use of the ins by the patient.Impedances were normal.The depth of the ins seems correct, but the ins does sometimes tilt tangentially to the skin but would not be returned.As the center was not able to observe the problem directly, the patient was asked to note the times when the problem occurred (date/time/circumstance) and the center suggested that she come back as soon as this happened so that it could be resolved.Information confirmed with physician / account.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id 97755, serial# unknown, product type recharger product id 97745, serial# (b)(6), product type programmer, patient product id 97745, serial# unknown, product type programmer, patient g2.Foreign: france.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received.It was confirmed that the ins cannot be repositioned, but it was stated that the ins is not mobile.The cause of the communication issue remains unknown, and the issue was never observed by the nurse, physician, or a manufacturer representative.The patient has not returned yet documenting if the issue has occurred again.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id 97755 lot# serial# unknown, product type recharger, product id 97745, lot# serial# (b)(6), product type programmer, patient product id 97745 lot# serial# unknown, product type programmer, patient medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key19000993
MDR Text Key339145935
Report Number3004209178-2024-08061
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/10/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2021
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/19/2024
Initial Date FDA Received03/28/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/04/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/10/2024
Date Device Manufactured03/12/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H11...."
Patient SexFemale
-
-