AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. FORCEPS/IRRIGATION PLUG (ISOLATED TYPE); FORCEPS/ IRRIGATION PLUG
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number MAJ-891 |
Device Problem
Failure to Clean Adequately (4048)
|
Patient Problem
Bacterial Infection (1735)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported, there was leakage and pseudomonas contamination with the visera cysto-nephro videoscope.The microbiology test reported a positive sample.Patients with infection began to arrive, the amount of patients or type of infection was not specified.It was identified that these patients had recently undergone cystoscopy procedures, therefore the cystoscopes and washing machines were tested, and one of the scopes tested positive.Around 20 days prior, customer had performed culture tests in all the devices and the results were correct.An assessment was performed by an olympus field service engineer and it was found that the use of the irrigation plug was not reprocessed correctly.The customer explained they usually disassemble and plunge in the same disinfectant solution they use with the cystoscopes.They do not brush, they only rinse before introducing in the disinfectant solution.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The evaluation of the event is ongoing.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.A cleaning, disinfection and sterilization checklist was provided.The devices have been re-processed and stored as they always are.Pre-cleaning was performed immediately after the patient procedure.Water was not aspirated through the instrument/suction channel with a suction pump.The instrument/suction channel was brushed.The device was not rinsed before manual disinfection.All channels were flushed with and immersed into the disinfectant.The concentration and expiration date of disinfectant were controlled.The aer/ewd used was minietd2.There were no defects on aer/ewd.All channels were connected with tubes when the endoscope was setting up into the aer/ewd.The concentration and expiration date of disinfectant were controlled.The water quality of the rinse water was controlled.After processing, the device was not dried.Olympus provided the following result of the culture test, performed at the third-party labs: sampling (prior to cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of (b)(6) by olympus): sampling date: (b)(6) 2024.Sampling from: sampling solution instrument/biopsy/suction channel cfu: (b)(4) bacterial identification: (b)(4).Sampling (prior to cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of (b)(6) by olympus): sampling date: (b)(6) 2024 sampling from: sampling of swabbing distal end unit cfu: (b)(4) bacterial identification: no detection.Sampling (after cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of (b)(6) by olympus): sampling date: (b)(6) 2024.Sampling from: sampling solution instrument/biopsy/suction channel and sampling of swabbing distal end unit.Cfu: (b)(4) bacterial identification: no detection.This medwatch is related to mfr report numbers 9610595 - 2024 - 00012, 9610595 - 2024 - 05853, and 9610595 - 2024 - 00480.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's investigation.The dhr was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.The case is not due to design.Based on the results of the legal manufacturer's investigation, a definitive root cause of the reported event could not be identified.However, it¿s likely the cause is related to the user deviating from the reprocessing steps recommended by olympus, and a difference in recognition on handling or reprocessing steps between olympus¿ recommendation and the user facility.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|