This report is being submitted retrospectively as part of an internal review.Ased on the investigation of the event on (b)(6) 2021, there was inherent lag in the sensing technology of the sensor and that the sensor glucose eventually caught up to the calibration (capillary) entry after 3-4 sensor readings.The investigation of the event on (b)(6) 2021 showed that the system was not within the 20/20 error target of the system.But this is not due to a system failure, and it was within the 30/30 error bounds of the cgm system, this occasional occurrence is still consistent with normal system operation.The system did not assert the hypo alert as the sensor readings did not cross the low glucose alert threshold at the time of the event.
|
On (b)(6) 2021, senseonics was made aware of a hypoglycemia event where user complained of not receiving low glucose alerts.The event occurred on (b)(6) 2021 at 02:23 am.The blood glucose (bg) value was 51 mg/dl where as sensor glucose (sg) value was 84 mg/dl.User was symptomatic (cravings, sweat, racing heart, dizziness).User did not receive alerts because the low alert threshold was set at 60 mg/dl and sg value did not cross it.User did not require any medical treatment and was able to self treat.
|