Edwards received notification of a pascal precision ace procedure in mitral position where during procedure, the patient became asystolic and a temporary pacemaker had to be implanted.The puncture and presentation of the guide sheath (gs) could be carried out without any problems.After steering down through the mitral valve, the patient became asystolic.As reported, the device did not touch the ventricle in any way.The decision was to insert a temporary pacemaker that was replaced by a mobile version after the procedure.As per the physician, the patient was already in a generally very poor condition before the procedure.A permanent pacemaker was being considered to be implanted in the next days after the procedure.The case was concluded very successfully.Starting mitral regurgitation (mr) grade was 4, and final mr grade was 1.
|
The following sections were updated/corrected/added: b4, b5, b7, d4, g3, g6, h2, h6 and h11 the complaint for device interaction with conduction system was confirmed with other empirical evidence as confirmed by the edward clinical specialist present at the case.No manufacturing non-conformities were identified through the evaluation.Images were not provided for this event; therefore, an imaging evaluation could not be performed.Available information suggests that the patient poor condition prior to the procedure, including pre-existing atrial fibrillation, may have contributed to the adverse event.
|