Philips received a complaint on the patient information center ix indicating that on march 8th, 2024, the system did not alarm for bed 123a when the patient saturation dropped.The patient was transferred to the icu, where they remained unresponsive.The patient did not pass away but is on life support.The following functional tests were performed: a field service engineer (fse) went onsite and pulled the error logs and clinical audit logs.The fse checked the current status of the piic and found that it was working properly.The complaint was escalated for technical investigation, and a clinical product specialist reviewed the clinical audit log.The log shows many low spo2 alarms starting on march 7th, 2024, at 20:05.On march 8th, 2024, at 00:30, there was an a spo2 low alarm for a value of 83, which was then acknowledged.Then, on march 8th, 2024, at 01:46, there are alarms for low spo2, ¿desat¿, low hr, and ¿non-sustain vt¿ that were discarded by the user.At 02:37, the logs note that there was a silence action performed at the pic ix for this bed, but there is no evidence of what alarm was silenced.However, it is presumed that there was a cyan inop that was not logged in the audit logs.The version of pic ix (b.02.06) does not log every single inop.The log includes all severe (yellow or red) inops, all battery inops, ¿ecg leads off¿, ¿transmitter off¿, ¿no spo2t¿, and ¿batt low¿.At 02:40, additional alarms for low spo2 and ¿desat¿ are logged and were silenced by the user.Based on the information available, there was no product malfunction found with the device, as the device alarmed for low spo2 and ¿desat¿, and there was a silencing of these alarms by the user.The reported problem was not confirmed.The device was confirmed to be operating per specifications and no failure was identified.The investigation concludes that no further action is required at this time.If additional information is received the complaint file will be reopened.
|