• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION PROMUS ELITE; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION PROMUS ELITE; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number 10674
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Difficult to Advance (2920); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Vascular Dissection (3160); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/09/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that catheter entrapment occurred.A 24 x 2.75 promus elite drug eluting stent was advanced for treatment.However, when treating a bifurcation, the second stent failed to advance, resulting in entrapment.Both stents were removed, and new stents were used to complete the procedure.The patient left the hemodynamics room in stable condition.
 
Event Description
It was reported that catheter entrapment occurred.A 24 x 2.75 promus elite drug eluting stent was advanced for treatment.However, when treating a bifurcation, the second stent failed to advance, resulting in entrapment.Both stents were removed, and new stents were used to complete the procedure.The patient left the hemodynamics room in stable condition.It was further reported that an angioplasty of the anterior descending artery bifurcation was performed on the proximal third and diagonal branch.The stenosed lesion was 80% in the anterior descending artery and 70% in the non-calcified diagonal branch.A boston scientific convey leftbu 3.5 guide catheter and a non-boston scientific 6 fr were used.Pre-dilatation involved 2.0 x 8 and 2.0 x 12 emerge balloon catheters.However, difficulties arose when positioning both stents as they became stuck together, rendering them immovable.Initially, the stent was placed in the diagonal branch.Attempts to position the lad stent were unsuccessful due to them sticking together.Eventually, everything was removed, wires, stents, and catheter had to be removed and the procedure had to be restarted from the beginning.The stents were noted to be "hooked together" but not trapped inside the artery.Dissection occurred upon the removal of all of the devices.Stents were placed in the diagonal branch, and several stents were implanted in the anterior descending artery to cover the dissection and to complete the procedure.
 
Event Description
It was reported that catheter entrapment occurred.A 24 x 2.75 promus elite drug eluting stent was advanced for treatment.However, when treating a bifurcation, the second stent failed to advance, resulting in entrapment.Both stents were removed, and new stents were used to complete the procedure.The patient left the hemodynamics room in stable condition.It was further reported that an angioplasty of the anterior descending artery bifurcation was performed on the proximal third and diagonal branch.The stenosed lesion was 80% in the anterior descending artery and 70% in the non-calcified diagonal branch.A boston scientific convey leftbu 3.5 guide catheter and a non-boston scientific 6 fr were used.Pre-dilatation involved 2.0 x 8 and 2.0 x 12 emerge balloon catheters.However, difficulties arose when positioning both stents as they became stuck together, rendering them immovable.Initially, the stent was placed in the diagonal branch.Attempts to position the lad stent were unsuccessful due to them sticking together.Eventually, everything was removed, wires, stents, and catheter had to be removed and the procedure had to be restarted from the beginning.The stents were noted to be "hooked together" but not trapped inside the artery.Dissection occurred upon the removal of all of the devices.Stents were placed in the diagonal branch, and several stents were implanted in the anterior descending artery to cover the dissection and to complete the procedure.It was further reported that the backward traction of the chordae may have caused a dissection in a segment previously treated with a balloon.The prosthesis, or stents, were adhered together, preventing any movement forward or backward, and were not positioned where they were supposed to be implanted, necessitating their removal.The dissection was a result of the coronary cord removal, and the complications were worsened by the stents becoming entangled.The dissection restricted flow, requiring a long segment to be stented to reestablish flow.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated b5 - describe event or problem: updated to include new information obtained.Device evaluated by manufacturer: a visual, tactile and microscopic examination was performed.An examination of the returned device identified that the mid-shaft was severely stretched.A microscopic examination of the distal extrusion noted that the inner/wire lumen was bunched at 6.3 from the bumper tip of the device.It was not possible to a load a recommended 0.014inch size wire through the wire lumen due to the inner/wire lumen damage.A visual and tactile examination identified that the hypotube was kinked at various locations along its length.An examination of the crimped stent identified no damages.No other issues were noted with the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROMUS ELITE
Type of Device
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key19031762
MDR Text Key339233460
Report Number2124215-2024-20183
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeAR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/24/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number10674
Device Catalogue Number10674
Device Lot Number0029653063
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/11/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/03/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/03/2024
04/29/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/26/2024
05/24/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/15/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
GUIDE CATHETER: CONVEY LEFTBU 3.5; GUIDE CATHETER: CONVEY LEFTBU 3.5; GUIDEWIRE: 6 FR; GUIDEWIRE: 6 FR
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-