CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. (ABBOTT) DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number DBEC-125 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Chest Pain (1776); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
|
Event Date 03/06/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H6 investigation conclusion code 22: the diamondback 360® coronary orbital atherectomy system instructions for use user manual states that perforation of vessels, pain and hypotension are potential adverse events that may occur and/or require intervention with use of the system.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the reported device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.Csi id: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used to treat a severely calcified, 85% stenosed lesion in the left anterior descending (lad) artery via femoral approach.The vessel was 2.5-3.0 mm in diameter.Three low-speed treatments were performed in the proximal lad with no issues.The oad was then advanced to the mid lad.The first treatment was successful but during the second treatment the physician thought the oad stalled when the torque guard turned on.The oad was retracted, glideassist was turned on, and the oad restarted.Angiographic imaging was performed which revealed contrast staining in the lad.The patient experienced mild chest pain and hypotension.A bolus of neo-synephrine was administered and a non-csi/non-abbott balloon was quickly advanced to tamponade the perforation.In the opinion of the physician the perforation was contained within the adventitia and could have been a ruptured hematoma due to non-pulsatile blood flow to the perforation.The physician believes that he should not have spun the second lesion because of the size and tortuosity of the vessel with the viperwire advance coronary guide wire.After balloon removal, covered stent placement followed.The patient stabilized very quickly.The procedure was completed with no further complications.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|