• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE BR3SUT W/OC; FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE BR3SUT W/OC; FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 222296
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/26/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: d4;h4: the device expiration date and device manufacture date are currently unavailable.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported by the sales rep from japan that during a shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgical procedure on (b)(6) 2024, it was discovered that the 4.5 healix advance br3sut w/oc device tip broke.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There was no delay in the procedure reported.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: correction d4: the device expiration date was unknown in the initial report.The date of expiration has been updated accordingly.Correction h4: the device manufacture date was reported as unknown on the initial report.Please note that the date of manufacture has been updated accordingly.The investigation has been updated to reflect the correct information: investigation summary: the product was returned to, depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.Depuy synthes mitek then conducted visual inspection of the device received.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Upon visual inspection, it could be observed that the anchor is broken into two pieces, the broken pieces were still attached to the inserter.The handle cover was not returned.The rest of the device was in a normal condition.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the 4.5 healix advance br3sut w/oc would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause can be attributed to a procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; axial misalignment occurred and consequently the anchor fracture.As per ifu-100191 inserting the awl or drill to less than the specified depth, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion may result in anchor fracture.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is required.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
4.5 HEALIX ADVANCE BR3SUT W/OC
Type of Device
FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 
3035526892
MDR Report Key19039557
MDR Text Key339321145
Report Number1221934-2024-01085
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705021321
UDI-Public10886705021321
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K120078
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number222296
Device Lot Number220L158
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/26/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/04/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/25/2024
04/30/2024
05/21/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/29/2024
05/01/2024
05/21/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/13/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-