• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9755RSL29A
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/24/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This is one of two manufacturer reports being submitted for this case.Please reference manufacturer report number 2015691-2024-02609 for details of the other event.The investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by the field specialist, during the transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) with a 29 mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve, the commander delivery system with valve was being advanced through the 16fr esheath+ and after the system had been advanced out of the loader, high resistance was felt.The resistance was noted between the strain relief and sheath shaft.An assessment of the valve was performed to determine if a strut had extended.A 90-degree angle for viewing was also used to determine if the strut had extended.There was no strut extension noted.Subsequently, an attempt was made again to advance the delivery system with valve when a strut was observed starting to extend away from the frame.Advancement of the delivery system with valve through the esheath+ was stopped and the entire system was withdrawn as a single unit without any issues.A new 16fr esheath+ was then prepared along with a new delivery system and a 29 mm sapien 3 valve.The second delivery system with second valve was able to be advanced smoothly through the second esheath+.The procedure was completed successfully without any complications.There was no patient injury.The first esheath+ was returned for evaluation.Evaluation of the returned device revealed the sheath had a loss of integrity.There was a liner tear approximately 4.5 cm in length.The liner tear began approximately 2.75 cm from the strain relief.Stretching was also noticed at the tear region approximately 7.25 cm in length.The stretching began at approximately 1.5 cm from the strain relief.Additionally, multiple liner strands were observed in the stretching region.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for correction and includes additional information based on investigation.The event reported is anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The device was returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the returned device revealed one (1) strut bent outward at the inflow side.Subsequently, the returned crimped valve was expanded, and the bent strut corrected.The valve frame was noted to be distorted.Additionally, the leaflets were noted to be wrinkled and dehydrated due to the storage condition (prolonged crimping) during the return handling process.Per the technical summary, the instructions for use (ifu), current risk mitigations that include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed.No inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.In this case, the valve frame damage was confirmed based on evaluation of the returned device.The available information suggests procedural factors (excessive device manipulation and high push force) likely contributed to the event as it was reported during advancement of the commander delivery system with valve through the 16fr esheath+ that there was high resistance felt after the system had been advanced out of the loader.Excessive device manipulation or high push force can lead to the valve struts interacting with the sheath shaft and result in the strut damage at the valve inflow side.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.A product risk assessment (pra) was previously initiated for this type of event.Further assessment revealed the control limits were not exceeded.As such, no corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key19051411
MDR Text Key340100475
Report Number2015691-2024-02611
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103215823
UDI-Public(01)00690103215823(17)260521(11)230522
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9755RSL29A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/12/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/11/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/05/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/07/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/22/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-