• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. RSP BASEPLATE, 30MM, W/P2 COATING; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. RSP BASEPLATE, 30MM, W/P2 COATING; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 508-32-204
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 03/08/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery, the agent reported "(pain / mobility issues presumably due to baseplate position.Baseplate had been placed too superior in primary case.According to revision surgeon doctor socket poly was very worn.Envois baseplate, screws and sphere were.Removed and replaced with tornier.A portion of the envois baseplate central screw broke off in bone and was left in.The patient on purpose.Enovis poly implanted)".The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 4 years and 6 months apart.This evaluation is limited in scope as the items associated with this investigation were not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to central screw of baseplate broke off, pain and wear.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as poor bone density, prolonged overhead activities, inadequate soft tissue support, patient activities or trauma.
 
Event Description
Revision surgery - due to pain / mobility issues presumably due to baseplate position.Baseplate had been placed too superior in primary case.According to revision surgeon dr.(b)(6) poly was very worn.Envois baseplate, screws and sphere were.Removed and replaced with tornier.A portion of the envois baseplate central screw broke off in bone and was left in.The patient on purpose.Enovis poly implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The agent reported "(pain / mobility issues presumably due to baseplate position.Baseplate had been placed too superior in primary case.According to revision surgeon doctor socket poly was very worn.Envois baseplate, screws and sphere were.Removed and replaced with tornier.A portion of the envois baseplate central screw broke off in bone and was left in.The patient on purpose.Enovis poly implanted)".The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 4 years and 6 months apart.This evaluation is limited in scope as the items associated with this investigation were not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to central screw of baseplate broke off, pain and wear.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as poor bone density, prolonged overhead activities, inadequate soft tissue support, patient activities or trauma.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RSP BASEPLATE, 30MM, W/P2 COATING
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P
9800 metric blvd
austin, tx 78758
MX   78758
Manufacturer Contact
james mcmahon
9800 metric blvd
austin, TX 78758
MDR Report Key19056505
MDR Text Key339551278
Report Number1644408-2024-00429
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWS
UDI-Device Identifier00888912144391
UDI-Public00888912144391
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112069
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number508-32-204
Device Lot Number769P1619
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/08/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/06/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/24/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured05/29/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
506-03-118 LOT: 832C1575; 506-03-126 LOT: 834C1596; 506-03-130 LOT: 835C1574; 508-32-101 LOT: 862C2895; 509-02-032 LOT: 951W1226
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight135 KG
-
-