ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. RSP BASEPLATE, 30MM, W/P2 COATING; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 508-32-204 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Failure of Implant (1924); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Implant Pain (4561)
|
Event Date 03/08/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reason for this revision surgery, the agent reported "(pain / mobility issues presumably due to baseplate position.Baseplate had been placed too superior in primary case.According to revision surgeon doctor socket poly was very worn.Envois baseplate, screws and sphere were.Removed and replaced with tornier.A portion of the envois baseplate central screw broke off in bone and was left in.The patient on purpose.Enovis poly implanted)".The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 4 years and 6 months apart.This evaluation is limited in scope as the items associated with this investigation were not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to central screw of baseplate broke off, pain and wear.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as poor bone density, prolonged overhead activities, inadequate soft tissue support, patient activities or trauma.
|
|
Event Description
|
Revision surgery - due to pain / mobility issues presumably due to baseplate position.Baseplate had been placed too superior in primary case.According to revision surgeon dr.(b)(6) poly was very worn.Envois baseplate, screws and sphere were.Removed and replaced with tornier.A portion of the envois baseplate central screw broke off in bone and was left in.The patient on purpose.Enovis poly implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The agent reported "(pain / mobility issues presumably due to baseplate position.Baseplate had been placed too superior in primary case.According to revision surgeon doctor socket poly was very worn.Envois baseplate, screws and sphere were.Removed and replaced with tornier.A portion of the envois baseplate central screw broke off in bone and was left in.The patient on purpose.Enovis poly implanted)".The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 4 years and 6 months apart.This evaluation is limited in scope as the items associated with this investigation were not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the products that may have contributed to the reported event.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to central screw of baseplate broke off, pain and wear.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical such as poor bone density, prolonged overhead activities, inadequate soft tissue support, patient activities or trauma.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|