MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SÃ RL TRUESPAN 12 DEGREE PEEK; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 228151 |
Device Problem
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/25/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported from switzerland that during a meniscal repair procedure, it was observed that the truespan 12 degree peek device did not shoot out the implants when the red trigger was pulled.There were no reports of delays in the surgical procedure nor if an identical spare device was available for use.There was patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).The lot number was unknown.D4, g1, h4: the lot number was unknown; therefore, the expiration date, manufacturing site name and device manufacture date were unknown.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: d4: the lot number and expiration date were reported as unknown on the initial report; and have been updated accordingly.Therefore, udi: (b)(6).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: h4: the device manufacture date was reported as unknown on the initial report; and has been updated accordingly.Investigation summary the product was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.The depuy synthes mitek team conducted visual inspection of the returned device.Visual inspection found that truespan 12 degree peek red trigger is broken.Both plates and the suture were found still attached to the needle.A functional test was unable to be performed due to the condition of the device.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the truespan 12 degree peek would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause could be traced to a portion of tissue that was entered inside the applier needle causing a mechanical obstruction of the first plate when it was going to be deployed; this obstruction and the force applied to the trigger are contributive factors of the broken trigger.As per ifu, it is necessary to use a calibrated probe, measure the width of the meniscal tissue to be repaired and set the adjustable depth.Also, it is important to fully squeeze the red deployment trigger while maintaining depth positioning to deliver the first implant.The implant is fully deployed when you hear an audible ¿click¿.Fully release the trigger after deployment, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review a review of the batch manufacturing records was conducted on finished lot number: 141l322, and no related non-conformances were identified.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|