• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Failure to Interrogate (1332); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
2024-mar-21: information was received from multiple sources (patient, manufacturer representative, healthcare provider) regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The reason for call was patient stated they are trying to get an mri and the mri tech told them they can't do it unless they can put the device into mri mode.Patient stated when they try to charge the implant it is not doing anything.Patient service asked patient if they have tried charging the implant and patient said they have not charged their implant in over 12 years.The issue was not resolved through troubleshooting.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider (hcp) to further address the issue.Manufacturer representative (rep) said patient tried to get an mri earlier this week but they couldn't connect to their implant.Rep didn't have further detail.Rep to further investigate with patient. reviewed mri eligibility.Technical services(ts) recommended eligibility form. eligibility for if rep can't get patient out of overdischarge.Additional information was received from a healthcare provider (hcp) regarding an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The reason for call was caller said pt had device that had not worked for "12 years" and device was not charging and would not do anything at all.Caller said the ins was going to get replaced in the future, but caller was wondering about mri eligibility.Reviewed mri considerations.2024-apr-05: additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep).The rep reported that the patient said their device worked for 3 months after their surgery, but not since then.Rep's guess is that it was over discharged and the rep at the time did not tell the patient that they¿d have to meet up for a physician reset mode.Rep met with patient and tried, but it was unsuccessful since it¿s been 8 years.The patient was given the eligibility forms for mri from their pain management physician.Patient is also scheduled for a battery replacement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Rep reported the ins not charging occurred 8 years ago, not 12.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key19060694
MDR Text Key339605993
Report Number3004209178-2024-08651
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109483
UDI-Public00643169109483
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/14/2016
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/21/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/08/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/05/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/02/2024
Date Device Manufactured01/14/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-