Catalog Number 9310.23G02 |
Device Problem
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/27/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complaint is under investigation.In case of a product return, the device will be investigated, otherwise we will review the device history record, and/or any log files if available, or try to replicate the problem on similar product.As investigations on the actual product or representative sample of a batch may alter the device, we request to inform us within 7 days after submission of this report, in case the investigations that alter the device should be halted until approval of the nca, as per article 89 of eu-mdr.
|
|
Event Description
|
We have been informed that during viterectomy, the surgeon wanted to change the infusion line from one trocar to another trocar.At this time, the trocar valve remained in the push fit system.It was very difficult to remove the valve from the irrigation tubing and during this time there was no pressure in the eye.This happened twice during the procedure.No report that actual patient harm occurred, or that the surgery was prolonged > 30 minutes.
|
|
Event Description
|
We have been informed that during viterectomy, the surgeon wanted to change the infusion line from one trocar to another trocar.At this time, the trocar valve remained in the push fit system.It was very difficult to remove the valve from the irrigation tubing and during this time there was no pressure in the eye.This happened twice during the procedure.No report that actual patient harm occurred, or that the surgery was prolonged > 30 minutes.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
In regard to this complaint, one 23 gauge trocar set was provided for evaluation along with the video.Visual inspection revealed one cannula with closure valve attached to the infusion line with damage that possibly occurred due to removal during the surgery.Functional inspection with other cannulas from the pack did not reveal any issues.Extensive investigation could not determine the cause of the incident as there were no visible anomalies in comparison with the specifications.Device history record revealed no anomalies, and no similar complaints were reported for the affected batches prior or since the incident.As the root cause could not be determined and manufacturer related cause of the complaint could not be confirmed, no review of risk assessment was warranted.Similar complaints were chosen by selecting the same failure mode as reported, and the number of devices distributed was chosen to be number of all trocar canulla sets distributed per period.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|