• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CEPHEID XPERT GBS; GBS RT-PCR TEST

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CEPHEID XPERT GBS; GBS RT-PCR TEST Back to Search Results
Catalog Number GXGBS-100N-10
Device Problem False Negative Result (1225)
Patient Problem Sepsis (2067)
Event Date 01/14/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Uk customer contacted cepheid on 12-mar-2024 to report a questionable negative result on xpert gbs assay.On (b)(6) 2024 patient mother vaginal/rectal swab was collected and tested on xpert gbs per pi at 11:25 pm.On (b)(6) 2024 at 12:21 am, the test result reported: negative.On (b)(6) 2024 after childbirth, the baby exhibited symptoms and was said to be unwell.A blood sample was collected from the baby for blood culture analysis and sent to another lab (specific test performed and date of test not specified).The presence of gbs was confirmed in the blood culture.Diagnosis provided by medical practitioners for both patients was positive for gbs.Both were treated with antibiotics and both patients are now in stable condition.A request was sent to the additional lab for the blood culture to perform further analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Uk customer contacted cepheid on 12-mar-2024 to report a questionable negative result on xpert gbs assay.On (b)(6) 2024 patient mother vaginal/rectal swab was collected and tested on xpert gbs per pi at 11:25 pm.On (b)(6) 2024 at 12:21 am, the test result reported: negative.On (b)(6) 2024 after childbirth, the baby exhibited symptoms and was said to be unwell.A blood sample was collected from the baby for blood culture analysis and sent to another lab (specific test performed and date of test not specified).The presence of gbs was confirmed in the blood culture.Diagnosis provided by medical practitioners for both patients was positive for gbs.Both were treated with antibiotics and both patients are now in stable condition.A request was sent to the additional lab for the blood culture to perform further analysis.This customer is the lead obstetrician at this hospital for a uk wide research study called gbs3.The maternity unit is taking part in the study in the intrapartum pcr arm.The customer found out by chance that a baby had developed early onset gbs disease, that the mother had been in the study with a negative pcr, and reported this to cepheid, albeit more than 2 months after the event.The sequence of events is that the mother, who was known to have had gbs cultured and a baby with sepsis in a previous pregnancy, had a negative intrapartum xpert gbs test and was therefore not given intrapartum antibiotics.The birth of the baby was not a normal vaginal delivery.After rupture of membranes the labor did not progress well, and mother eventually had a caesarean section.Her duration of rupture of membranes did not qualify her for intrapartum antibiotics but during surgery it was noted that she appeared to have an amniotic infection and antibiotics were started once the baby was delivered.The baby developed signs of sepsis soon after birth and gbs was cultured from blood cultures.Lumbar puncture was tried on two occasions but failed so it is not possible to know whether the neonate also had meningitis.Wound and placenta cultures from the mother also grew gbs.Review of the test details show a negative result with a late signal.This could reflect either a mutation making it difficult for the test to detect the target, or a sample with low bacterial load below the limit of detection of the test.The isolate from the baby's blood culture has been requested from the laboratory who are seeking permission to send this to cepheid.Baby was discharged stable after two weeks treatment with cefotaxime.The investigation is ongoing.Additional information regarding likely root cause will be provided in a follow-up report once the investigation has been completed.Note for section h3 device evaluated by manufacturer - answer of no is due to the single use of the xpert gbs test and the unavailability of that product lot to be returned to cepheid.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XPERT GBS
Type of Device
GBS RT-PCR TEST
Manufacturer (Section D)
CEPHEID
904 e caribbean dr
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer (Section G)
CEPHEID
904 e caribbean dr
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer Contact
somesh lalithraj
904 e caribbean dr
sunnyvale, CA 94089
4085488951
MDR Report Key19076025
MDR Text Key339777848
Report Number3004530258-2024-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJR
UDI-Device Identifier07332940000127
UDI-Public07332940000127
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K060540
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberGXGBS-100N-10
Device Lot Number1001233061
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/12/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured09/25/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-