The zio at device incorrectly detected artifact as an arrhythmia during the patient¿s wear period.The hcp requested device data from irhythm to review the patient's arrhythmia.Irhythm's investigation found that the preliminary ecg interpretation was misclassified, and the interpretation was amended.The hcp was notified immediately, and irhythm learned that the patient was admitted to the hospital based on the initial preliminary results but not treated for that arrhythmia.Subsequently, a different arrhythmia was noted on ecg, and the patient was treated.No further information was provided.
|