• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC. DIAMONDBACK CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM (VIPERWIRE ADVANCE); CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE GUIDEWIRE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC. DIAMONDBACK CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM (VIPERWIRE ADVANCE); CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE GUIDEWIRE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 03/18/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.Csi id: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used to treat an 80% stenosed lesion in moderately tortuous severely calcified vessel in right coronary artery (rca) via femoral access.The vessel diameters were 4.0mm distal and 4.5mm proximal and was primary wired with viperwire advance guidewire without any difficulty.Six low-speed treatments were performed in the distal area and glide assist was used in the proximal area treatments.While spinning, the viperwire did not come close to the oad.The physician decided to exchange the viperwire with an abbott whisper extra support guide wire to place a stent.During removal of viperwire, imaging showed the viperwire tip was dislodged in a very small branch off the distal rca and was not moving.A second physician was called, and it was decided to leave the viperwire fragment in place since no snaring device would fit in the small artery and the artery did not feed any vessel.In the opinion of the physician, the rca branch was too small that the viperwire tip got stuck in it during atherectomy when the oad spun, and got fractured when the viperwire was retracted during removal efforts.No wire bias was observed.The viperwire was exchanged with abbott whisper extra support guide wire.Three stents were placed followed by post dilation with ballooning to complete the procedure.The patient was stable and did not experience further complication and medical intervention.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the reported device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.The material inspection report for this guide wire lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.Csi id: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIAMONDBACK CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM (VIPERWIRE ADVANCE)
Type of Device
CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE GUIDEWIRE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC.
1225 old highway 8 nw
st. paul 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC.
1225 old highway 8 nw
st. paul 55112
Manufacturer Contact
keerthi bangalore ramanath
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul 55112
MDR Report Key19080733
MDR Text Key339878177
Report Number3004742232-2024-00161
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130005
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/18/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/10/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/03/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/03/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-