• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT CLEARVUE ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT CLEARVUE ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5608062
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bacterial Infection (1735); Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 05/27/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the patient allegedly experienced infection.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported as unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.The medical records allege that, a patient underwent port-a-cath insertion procedure for treatment for malignant neoplasm of upper outer quadrant of left breast.And the port placement proceeded as skin incision on the chest wall and a subcutaneous tunnel, pocket were then constructed using blunt dissection.The chest power port catheter was tunneled from the chest wall incision to the cervical incision.A peel away sheath was then advance over the guidewire into the superior vena cava.The chest port catheter was then advanced through the peel away sheath using fluoroscopic guidance into the superior vena cava.The catheter was positioned with its tip at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium and cut to length.Further the chest power port catheter was attached to the chest port reservoir.And the port catheter was flushed and ready for use.Approximately four months twenty-six later the port placement, patient admitted from emergency department for evaluation of muscle spasm and puss drainage from the port-a-cath of right chest wall.Patient diagnosed with unspecified infection due to central venous catheter.After two days the patient discharged.After two days, patient underwent port-a-cath check and port-removal procedure for cellulitis of the chest wall.A single incision was made over the reservoir and port was removed in its entirety.Post-procedural image demonstrated no residual catheter fragments within the chest.The incision was sutured using interrupted subcutaneous sutures.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported infection based on the medical records.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.(expiration date: 11/2023) section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that four months and fourteen days post a port placement via the right internal jugular vein, the patient allegedly developed with staphylococcus aureus bacterial infection as a result of the defective infected port.Reportedly, the infected port was removed.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT CLEARVUE ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key19085892
MDR Text Key339877858
Report Number3006260740-2024-01622
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741027369
UDI-Public(01)00801741027369
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122899
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number5608062
Device Lot NumberREGT5424
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/21/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/11/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/17/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age40 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-