C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 M.R.I. LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT,HICKMAN SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 0603880 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Difficult to Insert (1316); Dull, Blunt (2407)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/24/2024 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, when tried to dilate the vein, the internal dilator was allegedly noted with a blunt tip.It was further reported that when tried to dilate, the tip of the internal dilator allegedly broke.Furthermore it was not possible to insert the device and there was bleeding.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 07/2026) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, when tried to dilate the vein, the internal dilator was allegedly noted with a blunt tip.It was further reported that when tried to dilate, the tip of the internal dilator allegedly broke.Furthermore, it was not possible to insert the device and there was bleeding.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported dilator tip blunt, fracture and difficult to insert issues as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2026), g3, h6 (method).H11: b3, h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|