It was reported that on an unknown date, a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat mitral regurgitation and flail.On an unknown date, at a one month follow up, an echocardiogram was performed and revealed recurrent mitral regurgitation.It was noted that the physician was concerned that the clip had a side bite or a chord in the grasp.
|
It was reported that on an unknown date, a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat mitral regurgitation and flail.On an unknown date, at a one month follow up, an echocardiogram was performed and revealed recurrent mitral regurgitation.It was noted that the physician was concerned that the clip had a side bite or a chord in the grasp.Subsequent to the previously filed report, additional information was received: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2024, a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4+ and flail.A mitraclip xt was inserted, and grasping was performed.However, difficulties visualizing the clip during the procedure occurred.The clip was implanted.However, following deployment, the clip rotated.In the physician¿s opinion, this was likely due chordae being grasped with the leaflets.The procedure was completed with one clip implanted, reducing the mr to a grade of 1+.On (b)(6) 2024, the patient returned for a one month follow up.An echocardiogram was performed and revealed that the clip had detached from the posterior leaflet and remained attached to the anterior leaflet (single leaflet device attachment/slda), causing the mr to increase to a grade of 4+.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported entrapment of device (chordae being grasped with the leaflets).The poor image resolution was associated with very challenging imaging.The reported migration (partial clip movement) and subsequent slda appear to be cascading effects of the entrapment of device.The reported mr appears to be due to the slda.Mr is listed in the instructions for use as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported serious injury/illness/impairment was a result of case specific circumstance as no additional treatment/intervention was provided.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|