• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. LVIS D; INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. LVIS D; INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 214017-CAS-D-CN
Device Problem Retraction Problem (1536)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/25/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported: when the stent was released, multiple attempts were made to push and pull the release, but the stent fell down.When retracting the stent, there was resistance, and the stent could not be retracted.The stent could not be retracted into the microcatheter.The stent and microcatheter removed together.Patient is normal.There was no patient injury nor intervention performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation is ongoing.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.
 
Event Description
As reported: when the stent was released, multiple attempts were made to push and pull the release, but the stent fell down.When retracting the stent, there was resistance, and the stent could not be retracted.The stent could not be retracted into the microcatheter.The stent and microcatheter removed together.Patient is normal.There was no patient injury nor intervention performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Items returned for investigation: 2x stent, 1x pusher, 2x microcatheter.Items not returned for investigation: 2x introducer, 1x pusher.Two stents and two microcatheters were returned for investigation and will be referred to as 1 and 2 for clarity.A single pusher was returned advanced inside of microcatheter 1.Stent 1 was returned fully deployed, and the measurements are not consistent with the size of the stent involved in the reported event; therefore, no further testing was conducted on stent 1.Stent 2 was returned detached in the hub of microcatheter 2.Pusher 1 was retrieved from microcatheter 1 and was found to have damage to the body coil and warning marks.Microcatheter 2 was found to be kinked at the distal end of the strain relief.Stent 2 was retrieved from microcatheter 2 and the measurements were consistent with the device involved in the reported complaint.The stent was loaded onto an in-house pusher with an in-house introducer and advanced into an in-house microcatheter.The stent was able to advance, resheathe, and deploy without resistance or premature detachment during the investigation.Two stents and two microcatheters were returned for investigation and were referred to as 1 and 2 during the investigation for clarity.Stent 1, pusher 1, and microcatheter 1 did not appear to have been involved in the reported event as this stent did not match the device size associated with the complaint.Stent 2, which did match the size of the reported device, was returned detached in the hub of microcatheter 2.Microcatheter 2 was found kinked at the distal end of the strain relief, which may have caused or contributed to the detachment of stent 2.As stent 2 was returned detached in the hub of microcatheter 2, this investigation could not determine if the device experienced issues retracting back into the microcatheter during the procedure, nor could the investigation determine whether the stent ¿fell down¿ as described in the reported event.Stent 2 was able to successfully advance through and retract into an in-house microcatheter without prematurely detaching during functional testing.The introducer and pusher associated with the reported stent was not returned for evaluation, so the investigation could not determine if they had caused or contributed to the reported complaint.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LVIS D
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key19093928
MDR Text Key340686339
Report Number2032493-2024-00288
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QCA
UDI-Device Identifier00842429115923
UDI-Public(01)00842429115923(11)231006(17)260930(10)0000434333
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P170013
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number214017-CAS-D-CN
Device Lot Number0000434333
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/04/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/25/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/11/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/02/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured10/06/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
HEADWAY 21 (LOT 0000464874, MODEL MC212150S-CN).
-
-