The dispatched dräger service engineer tested the workstation in follow-up of the event and could not identify a deviation from specification except a depleted internal battery.The course of event could be reconstructed as follows: indeed the device posted a ventilator failure alarm during the concerned procedure because the device was running on internal battery and, the voltage had underrun the minimum threshold that is required to drive the ventilator motor.It was later determined that the device was not properly connected to mains supply.After reconnecting the device to mains power, the unit was fully functional again, charging of the internal battery was possible as well.When powered-on, the device clearly signalizes if it runs on mains supply or on internal battery.The residual capacity is being displayed continuously and, the device will post alarms if the latter underruns 20% and 10%, respectively.At full depletion of the battery, a power loss alarm powered by an independent power source will be generated.The log file indicates that the power-on self-test performed in the morning of the doe was passed w/o deviations, the internal battery was charged to 100%.Further, there's evidence that the depletion alarms were posted as expected.It is not known why the users could not manage to manually ventilate the patient - the device design allows manual ventilation with the built-in breathing bag for which the gas flow has to be set manually; the procedure to establish the emergency gas dosage is explained in the ifu.Finally, it can be concluded that there is no issue with the device which would require repair or correction; the event was caused by a chain of use errors with a likely relation to lack of training.Appropriate risk mitigation measures are in place.
|