The reported event could not be confirmed based on available medical record and medical experts assessment.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not a returned for investigation.The device history record could not be reviewed because the affected device was not returned, and the lot number was not communicated.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Full tar (construct) ¿ cyst formation both at the tibial and talar side, with subsidence of both components.No sure sign of loosening, although suspect for it, especially the tibia component.There are however areas where the tibial implant is still fixed to the bone.Failure of total ankle replacement (tar) over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient (radiological and clinical) information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In case where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information (e.G.Clinical status, exact symptoms and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician) is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and/or the device in relation to cause of the failure.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed ¿no conclusive statement can be provided.There is some radiolucence visible around the base of the tibial component, which consists of several inbone parts.The talar implant shows smaller radiolucence as well.There is no clear statement possible regarding loosening or migration of the components.However, no conclusive statement can be given without further clinical information regarding the underlying cause or the relation to the device.¿ more detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.According to the hcp, there is some radiolucence visible around the base of the tibial component and the talar component as well.But there is no clear statement possible regarding loosening or migration of the components and hence no conclusive statement can be given without further clinical information regarding the underlying cause or the relation to the device.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
|