According to the reporter, even though it was impossible to know where the tracheal tube was located if it did not appear in the camera field of view, the videolaryngoscope was still use.In a state where a glottis was visualized during the procedure, the tracheal tube was advanced nasally, and was advanced further without the tip of the tube appearing in handle's field of vision, which resulted in perforation of the pharyngeal wall.
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|