• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND ENDURANT II AORTIC STENT GRAFT; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND ENDURANT II AORTIC STENT GRAFT; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number ETCF2828C49E
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/10/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
An endurant iis stent graft system was implanted during the endovascular treatment of a 50mm abdominal aortic aneurysm.It was reported during the index procedure, the endurant cuff (b)(6) deployed unevenly.It was observed that the left side of the graft landing higher than the right.Per the physician the cause was due to abnormal device deployment.No additional clinical sequelae were reported, and the patient is fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information received; it was reported that deployment steps where followed per the ifu.There was posterior/anterior angulation noted.It was clarified that the endurant bifurcated device was landed low intentionally due to anatomy, therefore the cuff was implanted.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Film evaluation summary: the reported deployment issue- left side of the endurant cuff stent graft landing higher than the right could not be fully confirmed from the single still angiogram film provided; therefore, the cause of the event could not be determined.Lack of pre-implant cts did not allow for evaluation of the pre-implant anatomy and procedural angiograms showing the deployment of the stents were not provided for a thorough assessment of the event.It is possible that the reported patient's angulated neck may have contributed to the reported event, but this could not be confirmed on this review.B5: additional information received: it was confirmed that the stent graft etcf2828c49e (b)(6) appeared normally contained within the graft cover of the delivery system prior to use and a second cuff etcf2828c49e (b)(6) was implanted to address the reported deployment issue with the device etcf2828c49e (b)(6).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDURANT II AORTIC STENT GRAFT
Type of Device
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key19103811
MDR Text Key340107284
Report Number9612164-2024-01789
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
UDI-Device Identifier00613994991447
UDI-Public00613994991447
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/29/2024
Device Model NumberETCF2828C49E
Device Catalogue NumberETCF2828C49E
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/11/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/15/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/15/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/15/2024
04/25/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/15/2024
05/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/30/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-