• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCON

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCON Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Connection Problem (2900); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/11/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Information was received from an unknown source regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for incontinence.It was reported that the patient had a planned revision of their ipg as it moved from one side to the other.At the procedure, the lead was disconnected from the ipg.When the hcp tried connecting to the lead again, they couldn't connect the lead to the device.No clicks were heard when using the torque wrench.The hcp tried several times to fasten the screw but couldn't.The ipg was cleaned and the lead was wiped with a sterile cloth.The hcp decided to implant a new ipg.The issue was reported as being resolved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: analysis of the returned ins serial# (b)(6) determined that the setscrew on the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was backed out beyond the point of being able to engage with the connector block.Analysis determined that the setscrew of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was backed out beyond the point of being able to engage with the connector block and was cross-threaded.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCON
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key19112998
MDR Text Key340231268
Report Number3004209178-2024-09132
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeDA
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2022
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/11/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/15/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/08/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/02/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age31 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight82 KG
-
-