• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 UNKNOWN PORT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 UNKNOWN PORT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN PORT
Device Problems Difficult to Flush (1251); Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Suction Problem (2170)
Patient Problem Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 10/09/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the port was allegedly nonfunctional.Furthermore, patient allegedly experienced fibrin sheath formation around the venous track.It was further reported that the port was removed, and new port was implanted.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported as unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.The patient underwent removal of old port and placement of new port.Patient with non-functional port who needs chronic central venous access.After the old catheter was examined under fluoroscopy, the pocket was opened, and the old port was removed with blunt and sharp dissection.The catheter was cut and pulled back about 8 to 10 cm and radiocontrast was injected to visualize the venous track of the catheter.A guidewire was inserted and passed down into the inferior vena cava.The catheter was then removed over the guidewire.The venous track of the catheter was stenotic.A long fibrin sheath was present and there was 60-70% stenosis throughout the innominate vein.An angioplasty balloon catheter was passed over the guidewire within the stenosis.A defect was observed in the balloon at the site of the previously identified stenosis.This represented a 60-70% stenosis at that point which resolved completely with balloon inflation.The catheter was passed over the guidewire into the right subclavian vein without difficulty.The tip of the catheter was positioned within the right atrium under fluoroscopic guidance.The new catheter was connected to a bard power port which flushed and aspirated well.The pocket was closed with two layers.Around six months later, patient underwent port implantation procedure.Around three months later, patient presented with neurological symptoms.Eventual workup revealed a superior vena cava stricture and a large azygos vein with some evidence of shunting.She had neurologic symptoms related to flushing the catheter.The transesophageal echocardiogram showed 4-5 cm focal obstruction of the mid portion of the superior vena cava to the opening of the entrance of the cava into the base of the right atrium.The right sided port at the incision was incised and the port-a-cath removed.Fluoroscopic re-examination following removal revealed no retained reminiscent of the catheter, documenting complete removal.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported suction problem, flushing difficulty and device appears to trigger rejection.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3, h6 (method).H11: h1, h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the port was allegedly nonfunctional.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced fibrin sheath formation around the venous track.Reportedly, the port was removed, and a new port was implanted.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN PORT
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key19113604
MDR Text Key340252656
Report Number3006260740-2024-01771
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
UNKNOWN
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/14/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN PORT
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/25/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/16/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/14/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-