There was no device available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.However, media analysis was provided, and it was possible to confirm that the fiber tip was broken.The device history review (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.It is possible that an excess of force and overhandling were applied to the device, causing the reported fiber tip broken.Based on analysis results, without proper evaluation of the device, it remains unknown the most probable cause that contributed to the event, therefore, a conclusion code of cause not established was assigned to this investigation.Correction to model number.
|