This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the device evaluation and the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over (4) year since the subject device was manufactured.The legal manufacturer could not confirm whether the customer's reprocessing steps deviated from the instructions for use.Based on the results of the investigation, it could not be determined what the foreign material was.Although, olympus confirmed foreign material remained inside the forceps channel.There was no physical damage to the location of the foreign material.The cause of the material remaining in the device could not be determined.As the methods for procedure in line with the reprocessing manual below, it is determined that the suggested event can be detected / prevented.The instruction manual operation manual ¿urf-v3, chapter 3 preparation and inspection¿ describes the methods for detection.The instruction manual reprocessing manual ¿urf-v3, chapter 5 reprocessing the endoscope¿ describes the methods for prevention.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|