The reported complaint was reviewed and the returned aveta max+ disposable resecting devices (max+ drd) lot # f23k12-01 (qty 2) were investigated.Based on the investigation and visual inspection, it was observed that tissue was stuck between the resecting teeth causing the resecting tips to not rotate as intended.Both the devices were tested for rotation both manually and through the controller.The devices were found to be functioning as intended.The poor visualization and rising fluid deficit was due to excessive fluid in the uterine cavity due to the perforation.Based on the location of the perforation (perforation in lateral uterine wall and uterine artery damage), the aveta resecting devices cannot reach to this location and the injury caused is therefore considered not as a result of device malfunction.Based on the event summary of the reported complaint and the investigation performed on the returned devices, it is unclear if meditrina devices contributed to the reported adverse event.Meditrina sales rep then followed up with the medical staff member at the facility who stated that the patient was taken to the hospital following the procedure and was found to have a large amount of blood in the abdomen.Perforation was noticed in lateral uterine wall and uterine artery damage was noted.The patient was treated in the hospital/or.Upon further follow up, it was stated that the patient was discharged home and was doing fine.
|