It was reported that during a cori assisted tka, patient had a 4-degree valgus deformity and surgeon planned for 2mm gaps through extension and flexion on the real intelligence cori.By the time he got to trialing, he realized that his flexion gap was looser than what he expected, and his extension gap was tighter than expected.He ended up having to go back and take an additional 6mm off the distal femur to open his extension gap.Which was something he said he had never done ever before.Surgery was performed, without any delay, with the same devices.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|
H3, h6: the real intelligence cori, rob10024, sn000498, used for treatment was not returned for evaluation.A visual and functional evaluation could not be performed and a relationship between the reported event and the device could not be determined.Screenshots and system log files provided were reviewed with the software support and clinical support teams.The reported problem was confirmed, the screenshots show that the surgeon cut an additional 6mm than initially planned for.The log files and screenshots do not show if the flexion gap was looser than the surgeon expected or that the extension gap was tighter than expected.The screenshots do show a planned extension gap of 7.2 mm medially and 5.4 mm laterally, as well as a flexion gap of 2.2 mm medially and 2.3 mm laterally.The implant looks appropriately sized, and it appears that the surgeon¿s first distal cut was minimal.It is possible that there were posterior osteophytes that were not removed before planning.The system logfiles do not indicate whether the surgeon was properly collecting the neutral position or rom collection.The most likely cause of the reported complaint is a known software defect.We are actively examining this defect to determine the appropriate course of action.A review of manufacturing and service records indicate the device met all specifications upon release into distribution.A complaint history review for similar reported/confirmed complaints found similar events.A historical escalation event review was completed.A review of prior escalation actions found no actions applicable to the scope of the reported complaint.The failure mode and associated risk have been anticipated within the risk file and the documented risk level is still adequate.Although no further containment or corrective action is recommended or required at this time, the failure mode will continue to be closely monitored through complaint investigation and trended through post market surveillance activities.
|