|
Catalog Number LXMC16 |
Device Problems
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s) (4521)
|
Event Date 01/01/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/22/2024.B3: only event year known: 2023.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Additional information received: ct- (b)(6) 2023- linx in place egd- (b)(6) 2023.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient has been suffering from esophageal spasms and dysphagia, refractory to multiple dilations.Device was implanted at (b)(6).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/2/2024 additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? on what date did the implant take place? on what date did the explant take place? what is the lot number of the linx device? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia and esophageal spasms ? besides the reported dysphagia and esophageal spasms , what was the reason for removal of the linx device? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? answer: there is no other information available from the customer.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4), date sent: 5/16/2024.Investigation summary: a washer was noted to be disconnected from a bead case and weld tracks are visible on both the washer and bead case.These findings suggest that the washer was pulled out of the bead case due to external forces applied during an explant procedure.The remaining device characteristics, excepting the issues called out above, show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure and tooling marks noted in some beads.Link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|