|
Catalog Number LXMC15 |
Device Problem
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
|
Patient Problem
Pocket Erosion (2013)
|
Event Date 01/01/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/22/2024 b3: only event year known: 2024 no lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Additional information received: egd 1/12/24 this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a linx has eroded.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/2/2024 additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what is the lot number? what was the date of implant? what was the date of explant? what were the first clinical symptoms that provided evidence of an erosion and when did they first occur? has the patient had any dilations, egd, or other procedure between the linx implant and discovery of the erosion? please describe and include the dates of the procedures.Are pictures or videos available? how many beads eroded? where were the eroded beads positioned? which best describes the device removal approach? endoscopically removed the eroded beads initially & laparoscopically removed the device at a later date endoscopically removed the eroded beads & laparoscopically removed the device the same day endoscopically removed the entire device laparoscopically removed the entire device was the patient stented? what is the current condition of the patient? answer: there is no other information available from the customer.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/16/2024.Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, tooling marks were noted in some beads.Link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|