|
Catalog Number LXMC14 |
Device Problem
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
|
Patient Problem
Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815)
|
Event Date 12/14/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/22/2024 no lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a linx was explanted due to dysphagia.Linx was implanted (b)(6) 2017 at baylor scott and white, dysphagia began (b)(6) 2024, explanted on (b)(6) 2024.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/2/2024.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? what is the lot number of the linx device? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia? besides the reported dysphagia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? if you have tried to get this information, but the account is unwilling to provide any additional information please let us know what you have done so we can document our report accordingly.Answer: there is no other information available from the customer.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/16/2024.Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, tooling marks were noted in some beads.Link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.The device lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|