Caller reports that a patient experienced postpartum hemorrhage and "bled at least 6 liters".Caller reports that the jada was placed "at some point" but did not control the bleeding.[device ineffective].No additional ae/pqc reported [no adverse event].Case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from united states was received from a other health professional (nurse) via clinical account specialist (cas) referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient's concurrent condition included postpartum hemorrhage.The patient's historical condition included pregnancy and delivery.The concomitant medications, past drugs and past drug reactions/allergies were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date, the patient was placed with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via unknown route (lot and expiration date were not reported) for postpartum hemorrhage.On an unknown date, the patient experienced postpartum hemorrhage and bled at least 6 liters.The vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was placed at some point but did not control the bleeding (device ineffective).The patient ended up needing a hysterectomy.Not more than one vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) device used.Nurse stated that she had very limited details.No additional adverse event (no adverse event) and product quality complaint reported.Upon internal review, the event device ineffective was considered to be serious due to required intervention (devices).Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.
|