|
Model Number 1177-01 |
Device Problems
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Failure to Deflate (4060)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/25/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that deflation failure occurred.An 8.0 mm x 40 mm, 135cm ranger drug-coated balloon (dcb) catheter was advanced for dilation along with a 7fr non-boston scientific sheath.During the procedure, the balloon was able to inflate and deflate at first.Upon second use, the balloon inflation was good, but could no longer be deflated.Due to repeated attempts, the physician had to puncture the balloon with a fine needle from the outside through the skin to destroy it.After that, the device was then removed through the sheath.The procedure was completed, and no patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that deflation failure occurred.An 8.0 mm x 40 mm, 135cm ranger drug-coated balloon (dcb) catheter was advanced for dilation along with a 7fr non-boston scientific sheath.During the procedure, the balloon was able to inflate and deflate at first.Upon second use, the balloon inflation was good, but could no longer be deflated.Due to repeated attempts, the physician had to puncture the balloon with a fine needle from the outside through the skin to destroy it.After that, the device was then removed through the sheath.The procedure was completed, and no patient complications were reported.It was further reported that the stenosed target lesion was 70% calcified, straight vessel in the superficial femoral artery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction of h6 impact codes of additional device required, f2301 to unexpected medical intervention, f23.Device evaluated by mfr: the ranger device was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the returned device found that the balloon had been inflated and was not refolded.It is not known when the balloon was subjected to positive pressure.The balloon was unable to be inflated due to the multiple shaft kinks.The markerbands and tip section of the device were visually examined, and no issues were noted with the markerbands or tip of the device.A visual and tactile examination of the shaft found multiple shaft kinks.The inner shaft was also noted to be damaged.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|