• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS PASCAL PRECISION; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS PASCAL PRECISION; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES Back to Search Results
Model Number 20000ISM
Device Problem Difficult to Insert (1316)
Patient Problem Cardiac Perforation (2513)
Event Date 03/28/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The event is captured by edwards lifesciences under complaint #: (b)(4).The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification of a pascal precision ace procedure in mitral position where two devices were implanted.During implantation of the second device, the team started to observe a drop in systemic pressure and heart rate increased to 140-150.After implantation and removal of the guide sheath a tamponade was observed.It was resolved with administering protamine and retracting blood from the pericardial sack percutaneously.No further complication was reported.The patient left the or breathing on his own.The grade of regurgitation before the procedure was 4+ and after the procedure 2.One of the operators thinks that probably during placement of the wire before our gs was introduced, the laa was punctured, but the other opinion from the echo physician is that maneuvering with our device might have damaged the right atrium vault (wall).There was no communication from the implanting team that there were issues with navigating/positioning/usability issues of an edwards device.Challenges were coming from anatomy, making it not possible to catch the flail entirely as it was prolapsing to the left atrium.That is why the operators decided to place the second device medially to the first one to stabilize the leaflets, not laterally (which was the initial idea).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following sections were updated/corrected/added: b4, d4, g3, g6, h2, h6 and h11.The complaint for difficult/unable to insert device into transseptal puncture location was confirmed with other empirical evidence as confirmed by the edwards clinical specialist present at the case.No manufacturing non-conformities were identified from the imaging evaluation.Available information suggests that a combination of patient and procedural factors may have contributed to the reported event.Procedural factors include a potential laa puncture or excess device maneuver near the right atrium wall may have contributed to the patient drop in systemic pressure and cardiac tamponade.Potential patient related factors were anatomical challenges with the leaflet prolapsing into the left atrium making it difficult to catch the flail entirely.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS PASCAL PRECISION
Type of Device
MITRAL VALVE REPAIR DEVICES
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
cassandra cook
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
5743778277
MDR Report Key19160168
MDR Text Key340791261
Report Number2015691-2024-03068
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKM
UDI-Device Identifier00690103213324
UDI-Public(01)00690103213324(17)250213
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P220003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/24/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number20000ISM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/28/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/22/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/24/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/24/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured02/14/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-