Siemens became aware of an incident that occurred while operating the primus hi unit.The user called siemens customer service on (b)(6) 2024, to report five patients that had experienced radiation damage after being irradiated with 6mev therapy in (b)(6) 2023.The radiation damage was described by the user as induced skin ulcers.On (b)(6) 2024, additional information was provided that one patient required a skin grafting surgery.
|
In total the user reported five (5) patients that experienced radiation damage.These patient treatments took place between (b)(6) 2023.However, only one patient required skin graft following the radiation treatment.The customer did not provide photos of the skin damages as requested by siemens.Typically, these skin lesions are characterized by redness, swelling and blisters.According to the information provided by the customer, the machine was repaired twice during this time period (10/30/2023-11/30/2023).1.) (b)(6), 2023, system reinstallation after console battery replacement with dose rate optimization.2.) november 28, 2023, the x-ray ionization chamber and g42 dose circuit board were replaced as no x-rays were detected.The investigation conducted by siemens showed that the medical facility continued to use the machine for patient treatments without performing the beam profile and dosing calibration/check after the repair had been completed.Quality assurance history has been requested but was not provided by the customer.The user manual clearly states the machine must evaluated by a physicist following service interventions.No device malfunction could be determined.The dosimetry calibration is under user¿s responsibility.The customer performed dosimetry and beam profile check on april 9, 2024, and it was found to be within the normal ranges.As no detailed data from the concerned system (logfiles, service history etc.) as well as no detailed treatment data were available, further investigation was not possible.There has no product design deficiency been alleged.
|