Model Number NU211T |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 03/31/2024 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Additional information/investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported, that there was an issue with nu211t, excia t plasmapore 12/14 size 11mm.According to the complaint description, the neck broke postoperatively.It was noted, to be firmly integrated.The stem was replaced with a non-aesculap head, due to deep post-sintering and 12/22 gait disturbance.A revision was necessary.According to manufacturer's reporting evaluation in accordance with 21 cfr 803, this event is considered reportable for the following reason: serious injury (report not later than 30 days).The assessment for the reportability of this adverse event was based on patient harm, revision.Additional information was not provided, nor available.The adverse event is filed under internal aesculap ag ref.No.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Update: involved components: nv202e - vitelene insert f 32mm sym.(internal aesculap ag ref.No.(b)(4)) nv150t - plasmafit plus cup size 50mm f(internal aesculap ag ref.No.(b)(4)) uknown implants from competitors (internal aesculap ag ref.No.(b)(4)).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: b5 - involved components added.B7 - medical history added.D9 - product return.D10 - involved components.H3 - yes, product evaluated.H6 - codes updated.Investigation results: visual inspection: during the examination it could be observed that the neck of the prostesis is broken off.The surface of the broken off neck of the stem shows several black dots.The proximal area of the shaft shows signs of the explantation.The fracture surface shows a fatigue fracture area and a forced fracture area.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all available lot numbers and the products were found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.There are no other similar complaints within these batches.According to manufacturer's reporting evaluation in accordance with 21 cfr part 803, section 803.3, this event is considered reportable for the following reason - adverse event (not later than 30 days).The assessment for the reportability of this adverse event was based on the patient harm, revision surgery.Conclusion/preventive measures: based upon the above-mentioned investigation results, a definitive root cause cannot be established.There are no hints for a material or manufacturing problem.One reason for breakage could be that during the surgery, a contact at the neck of the stem could have been made with the instruments leading as mentioned above to the several black dots.As the strength of the material is reduced at these points, the breakage could have taken place.Based upon investigation results, a capa is not necessary.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|